Author summary
72% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,948 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justin Carter results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 780 hits . Analysis detected 9,142 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,719 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,837 of 6,348 authors). This Justin Carter is worse (more manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group. Justin Carter
Author details
Total words: 7,719
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.3% percentile 2.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.9% 9.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 7.2% 7.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 10.1%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 7.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.2%, sitewide 0.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst