Gizmodo58%

'Fast Forever' Is Finally Back on Track 70%

By Justin Carter72%

7/5/2026, 4:25:22 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Pessimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 85 hits. Analysis detected 801 faulty-reasoning hits from 301 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 62.9% and a BS Rank of 70% (6,461 of 21,202 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the article peer group.

After three years of false starts, *Fast Forever* is on the road to reality. 
Before the weekend, star and franchise producer Vin Diesel used Instagram to announce production had started, where “people are grinding and incredible crews are working.” 
Diesel's always been the franchise's public face, and that's been even more true with *Forever. 
* From airing grievances with Universal to promising a release date, he's been hyping up the movie when it seemed like it wouldn't even happen without some potential creative and financial concessions made. 
In his video, Diesel thanked the “best fans in the world” for being patient for news since *Fast X* premiered in 2023. 
“You've been patient to the industry and the studio, and you've been patient with me,” he said. 
“Over the past three-and-a-half years, we've been grinding to make the most amazing finale. 
[...] 
Know that I hope to make you all proud.” 
As of this past January, *Fast Forever* will see the return of franchise vets Jordana Brewster, Michelle Rodriguez, Ludacris, Tyrese Gibson, Dwayne Johnson, and Gal Gadot. 
There's question marks over who else from the last movie will come back, including Sung Kang and Nathalie Emmanuel, who respectively play Han and Ramsey. 
(Those two were with Roman and Tej on the plane that crashed.) 
Likewise, it's anyone's guess over how, or if, this movie will bring back Brian O'Conner (Paul Walker), something Diesel promised back in 2025. 
These questions will likely be answered by the time *Fast Forever* releases in theaters on March 17, 2028. 
Want more io9 news? 
Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.6%Justin Carter: 7.1%Gizmodo: 4.1%Confirmation Bias8.6%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 1.5%Gizmodo: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.3%Justin Carter: 2.7%Gizmodo: 3.0%Availability Heuristic12.3%This article: 5.0%Justin Carter: 2.1%Gizmodo: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic5.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 2.5%Gizmodo: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.9%Gizmodo: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Justin Carter: 6.2%Gizmodo: 5.6%Framing Effect2.3%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.8%Gizmodo: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 8.6%Justin Carter: 1.4%Gizmodo: 0.4%Status Quo Bias8.6%This article: 9.3%Justin Carter: 1.0%Gizmodo: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect9.3%This article: 17.6%Justin Carter: 4.1%Gizmodo: 3.9%Optimism Bias17.6%This article: 15.9%Justin Carter: 1.3%Gizmodo: 2.2%Pessimism Bias15.9%This article: 11.0%Justin Carter: 9.9%Gizmodo: 7.6%Negativity Bias11.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.6%Gizmodo: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.6%Gizmodo: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%Justin Carter: 0.4%Gizmodo: 0.9%In-Group Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 1.2%Gizmodo: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 12.3%Justin Carter: 5.4%Gizmodo: 2.8%Halo Effect12.3%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.1%Gizmodo: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 12.3%Justin Carter: 2.3%Gizmodo: 1.6%Recency Bias12.3%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.4%Gizmodo: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 1.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.3%Justin Carter: 3.4%Gizmodo: 4.1%Appeal to Authority8.3%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 3.0%Gizmodo: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 1.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 16.9%Justin Carter: 7.6%Gizmodo: 5.4%Hasty Generalization16.9%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 2.1%Gizmodo: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.3%Justin Carter: 0.3%Gizmodo: 0.9%Bandwagon1.3%This article: 15.9%Justin Carter: 2.8%Gizmodo: 4.9%Appeal to Emotion15.9%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.3%Gizmodo: 1.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 4.3%Gizmodo: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.5%Gizmodo: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 7.6%Justin Carter: 0.8%Gizmodo: 0.5%Burden of Proof7.6%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.0%Justin Carter: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.3%Composition/Division4.0%This article: 8.3%Justin Carter: 5.1%Gizmodo: 2.0%Anecdotal8.3%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.0%Justin Carter: 2.5%Gizmodo: 2.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.3%Gizmodo: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.4%Gizmodo: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.3%Justin Carter: 10.1%Gizmodo: 4.7%Unattributed Quote8.3%This article: 8.3%Justin Carter: 2.9%Gizmodo: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection8.3%This article: 28.2%Justin Carter: 8.3%Gizmodo: 13.6%Biased Writer Voice28.2%This article: 12.0%Justin Carter: 2.9%Gizmodo: 1.6%Indoctrination12.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Carter: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 13.3%Justin Carter: 7.2%Gizmodo: 3.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…13.3%

301 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker29%attributed speech214writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageVin Diesel • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageVin Diesel • 22 words • 0.0% coverageVin Diesel • 17 words • 0.0% coverageVin Diesel • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageVin Diesel • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Vin Diesel

100%flagged-word coverage
87 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice-39.7 ptsWriter: 39.7%Vin Diesel: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+28.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Vin Diesel: 28.7%28.7%Quote-first Misdirection+28.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Vin Diesel: 28.7%28.7%Attempt to Sell a Product -18.7 ptsWriter: 18.7%Vin Diesel: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-16.8 ptsWriter: 16.8%Vin Diesel: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.