Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video301 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fast And Furious Franchise results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 160 hits. Analysis detected 1,302 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,767 of 16,562 topics). This Fast And Furious Franchise is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Fast And Furious Franchise
Topic details
Total words: 1,204
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.2% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 13.3%13.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.4%10.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.3%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos