Topic summary
⁠23%1 analyzed article/video187 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hazardous Tree Removal results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 327 faulty-reasoning hits from 748 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (6,275 of 21,194 topics). This Hazardous Tree Removal is worse (more manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
Hazardous Tree Removal
Topic details
Total words: 748
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.4% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles748 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.7%6.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 4.0%4.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos