Topic summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video548 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hate Crime Investigation results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 129 hits. Analysis detected 882 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,644 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (9,302 of 16,562 topics). This Hate Crime Investigation is better (less manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group.
Hate Crime Investigation
Topic details
Total words: 1,644
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510043.8% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.3%3.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos