Topic summary
61% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,447 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hacking results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 1,266 hits . Analysis detected 16,392 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,431 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 16% (13,904 of 16,559 topics). This Hacking is better (less manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group. Hacking
Topic details
Total words: 21,431
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score7 analyzed articles21.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst