Topic summary
⁠85%3 analyzed articles/videos61 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Finance results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 739 hits. Analysis detected 5,810 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,564 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,552 of 16,562 topics). This Government Finance is worse (more manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group.
Government Finance
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510072.5% percentile
4.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.1%19.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 15.1%15.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 20.7%20.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 7.9%7.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos