Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,144 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Energy Crisis results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 648 hits. Analysis detected 4,480 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,568 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (13,526 of 16,562 topics). This Global Energy Crisis is better (less manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group.
Global Energy Crisis
Topic details
Total words: 7,568
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

18% percentile
025507510018.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.6%8.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.6%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos