NPR84%

The Iran war created a global natural gas shortage  a windfall for U.S. companies 34%

By Julia Simon0%

4/14/2026, 10:50:57 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Framing Effect, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 145 hits. Analysis detected 1,097 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,008 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42.2% and a BS Rank of 34% (14,449 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the article peer group.

HOUSTON  Troubles in the Strait of Hormuz continue, with the U.S. now imposing a naval blockade on Iranian ports. 
More than six weeks after the war began, one key part of the global energy supply remains locked in the strait—liquefied natural gas, or LNG. 
LNG is mainly used for electricity and heating, and about a fifth of the global LNG supply is produced by state-owned QatarEnergy. 
Even if the strait opens, it's unclear when Qatar's LNG could reach buyers in Asia and Europe. 
Early in the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran, attacks hit QatarEnergy's LNG facilities. 
Energy experts tell NPR it could take several months to repair them. 
A return to full production capacity could take years. 
QatarEnergy did not respond to NPR's request for comment. 
With Qatar largely out of the picture, there's a global shortage of natural gas. 
That leaves an opening for the world's largest LNG exporter, the U.S. 
Last month, the heads of U.S. 
LNG companies gathered for a reception at CERAWeek by S&P Global, an annual industry conference in Houston. 
Mood lights made everyone look blue. 
But no one looked like they were feeling blue. 
With drinks flowing and a jazz band playing, the mood was celebratory. 
"We have a shortage of natural gas," U.S. 
Secretary of Energy Chris Wright told the crowd. 
"Where is that natural gas gonna come from? 
It's gonna come from continued ramps, continued investments to grow United States LNG exports." 
In recent weeks, LNG company executives have framed the U.S. as a reliable supplier in an unstable world. 
In a panel discussion at CERAWeek, Anatol Feygin, chief commercial officer of U.S. 
LNG giant Cheniere Energy, called the sudden shortage of LNG from the Strait of Hormuz a "guillotine issue." 
The U.S. set a record for LNG exports in March, but the U.S. only has so much capacity for production and exports. 
Making LNG requires cooling natural gas to negative 260 degrees Fahrenheit so it becomes liquid, and then transporting it on huge ships. 
There currently aren't enough gas pipelines or LNG terminals in the U.S., so ramping up LNG exports will take time. 
But several new LNG projects are under construction in the U.S. 
In late March, Cheniere completed a new part of its terminal near Corpus Christi, Texas, to add more export capacity. 
The U.S. 
LNG supply is forecast to grow by about 84% over the next five years, according to figures from S&P Global Energy. 
"U.S. 
LNG," Feygin said, "continues to rise to the challenge of meeting market disruptions and the tragedy of war." 
The recent market disruptions have been good for the U.S. 
LNG business, says Ira Joseph, international natural gas expert at Columbia University. 
He notes that U.S. producers have been buying natural gas to make the LNG they export at around $3 per million British thermal units (MMBtu)—that's the unit LNG is priced in. 
But, because of the war, in recent weeks those companies have been able to sell that LNG for around $20 per MMBtu in Asia and Europe. 
"So that spread provides a huge influx of cash for all of these companies," Joseph says. 
Natural gas prices in Asia and Europe are lower than they've been in recent weeks, but they still are much higher than when the war began. 
This windfall in profits is giving U.S. 
LNG companies momentum, Joseph says. 
"It certainly is good for them when they go to the banks and say, 'We would like to expand.'" 
"They're saying, 'Look, Qatar, they may say they're secure. 
They may say they're reliable. 
But we actually are secure,'" Joseph says. 
Since the war began, Cheniere's stock price has risen about 10%. 
Woodside Energy, an Australian company with many LNG projects, including in the U.S., has seen its stock price rise about 20% in that period. 
American LNG company Venture Global has seen its stock price rise about 30% since the war began. 
Venture Global recently closed on $8.6 billion of financing for phase 2 of an LNG project in Louisiana that is slated to start delivering gas next year. 
"During a time of great global uncertainty driven by the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, the United States—and its liquefied natural gas (LNG) exporters like Venture Global —continues to play a vital role in supporting energy security for allies around the world," Jess Szymanski, a spokesperson with Venture Global, wrote in an email to NPR. 
Questions of longevity 
At the LNG reception in Houston, chief executives from competing LNG companies based in the U.S., such as Cheniere and Freeport LNG, schmoozed in a VIP section cordoned off with a red velvet rope. 
But the party may not last. 
In one CERAWeek panel, Mark Abbotsford, chief commercial officer at Woodside Energy, warned if natural prices remain too high for too long, that could potentially lead to "demand destruction." 
That means switching away from natural gas to cheaper energy alternatives. 
"The reality is...if we think about the Goldilocks of LNG pricing where it's not too hot and too cold  the pricing levels at the moment are going to result in demand destruction," Abbotsford said to the panel. 
"We will see developing economies switching towards coal," he added. 
In the wake of recent LNG price hikes and shortages, the Philippines, Vietnam and Thailand are boosting coal use. 
Coal releases more planet-heating carbon dioxide than LNG when burned. 
The LNG supply chain also releases planet-heating methane, which is more heat trapping than carbon dioxide over a 20-year time frame, says Daniel Zimmerle, director of the Methane Emissions Program at Colorado State University. 
But it's not just coal. 
The LNG industry is seeing growing competition from renewable energy combined with batteries. 
Last year, Pakistan reduced its LNG imports, in part because of the country's rapid growth of solar and batteries. 
"There could be many future 'Pakistans' out there," Joseph says. 
He says those include Bangladesh, Vietnam and Thailand, which are investing heavily in renewable energy and battery storage. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.7%Julia Simon: 10.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Confirmation Bias4.7%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 1.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Julia Simon: 6.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.8%Availability Heuristic1.4%This article: 2.8%Julia Simon: 0.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic2.8%This article: 1.0%Julia Simon: 0.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.8%Hindsight Bias1.0%This article: 0.9%Julia Simon: 1.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.4%Overconfidence Bias0.9%This article: 8.9%Julia Simon: 12.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.1%Framing Effect8.9%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 0.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 1.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.5%Julia Simon: 2.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Optimism Bias2.5%This article: 0.6%Julia Simon: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Pessimism Bias0.6%This article: 0.6%Julia Simon: 13.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.3%Negativity Bias0.6%This article: 9.6%Julia Simon: 4.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Self-Serving Bias9.6%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 4.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 1.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 1.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.3%Julia Simon: 0.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.7%Recency Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 1.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.8%Julia Simon: 9.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.1%Appeal to Authority7.8%This article: 3.7%Julia Simon: 1.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%False Dilemma3.7%This article: 3.5%Julia Simon: 3.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Slippery Slope3.5%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.3%Julia Simon: 6.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 4.4%Hasty Generalization6.3%This article: 0.5%Julia Simon: 1.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Red Herring0.5%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 1.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 13.6%Julia Simon: 9.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.6%Appeal to Emotion13.6%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 14.4%Julia Simon: 4.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.4%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.3%Julia Simon: 2.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Anecdotal7.3%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.5%Julia Simon: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.5%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 0.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 0.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 1.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.0%Julia Simon: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Unattributed Quote2.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 3.1%Julia Simon: 0.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.1%Biased Writer Voice3.1%This article: 1.4%Julia Simon: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.0%Indoctrination1.4%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Simon: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Julia Simon: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.6%

1008 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers39%attributed speech616writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageChris Wright • 8 words • 0.0% coverageChris Wright • 8 words • 0.0% coverageChris Wright • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageAnatol Feygin • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageAnatol Feygin • 1 words • 0.0% coverageAnatol Feygin • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageIra Joseph • 12 words • 0.0% coverageIra Joseph • 31 words • 0.0% coverageIra Joseph • 26 words • 0.0% coverageIra Joseph • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageIra Joseph • 5 words • 0.0% coverageIra Joseph • 19 words • 0.0% coverageIra Joseph • 9 words • 0.0% coverageIra Joseph • 5 words • 0.0% coverageIra Joseph • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageJess Szymanski • 56 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageMark Abbotsford • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageMark Abbotsford • 38 words • 0.0% coverageMark Abbotsford • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDaniel Zimmerle • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageIra Joseph • 10 words • 0.0% coverageIra Joseph • 18 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jess Szymanski

100%flagged-word coverage
56 attributed words14% of attributed speech59% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jess Szymanski: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-5.0 ptsWriter: 5.0%Jess Szymanski: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-3.2 ptsWriter: 3.2%Jess Szymanski: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.