Author summary
ā 0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,459 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Simon results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 1,050 hits . Analysis detected 8,727 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,882 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ā 52% (3,233 of 6,628 authors). This Julia Simon is worse (more manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group. Julia Simon
Author details
Total words: 7,882
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.2% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.0% 9.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.3% 13.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 10.4% 10.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.3% 6.3% Fundamental Attribution E⦠Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.3%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst