Author summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos3,459 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Simon results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 1,050 hits. Analysis detected 8,727 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,882 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (3,233 of 6,628 authors). This Julia Simon is worse (more manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group.
Julia Simon
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠52%Julia Simon (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,882
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

51% percentile
025507510051.2% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.2%12.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.0%9.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.3%13.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.2%2.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 10.4%10.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 6.3%6.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 12.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos