Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,136 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CATHY BUSSEWITZ results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Recency Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 474 hits . Analysis detected 2,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,544 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,697 of 6,244 authors). This CATHY BUSSEWITZ is better (less manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group. CATHY BUSSEWITZ
Author details
Total words: 4,544
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.8% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 10.4% 10.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 10.4%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% No True Scotsman: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.1% Composition/Division: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst