Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video786 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Genetic Predisposition results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 290 hits. Analysis detected 1,799 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,144 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,166 of 16,562 topics). This Genetic Predisposition is better (less manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group.
Genetic Predisposition
Topic details
Total words: 3,144
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 7.2%7.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.0%5.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos