Topic summary
⁠93%3 analyzed articles/videos2,202 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gaza War results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.8% saturation with 2,869 hits. Analysis detected 19,632 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,330 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,704 of 16,562 topics). This Gaza War is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Gaza War
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 10,330
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510071.6% percentile
4.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 27.8%27.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 24.4%24.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 19.7%19.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.8%16.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 8.1%8.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 27.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 24.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 19.7%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos