Topic summary
32% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,736 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gang Violence results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 2,367 hits . Analysis detected 14,105 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,517 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (14,643 of 16,562 topics). This Gang Violence is better (less manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group. Gang Violence
Topic details
Total words: 19,517
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.6% percentile 1.6% BS Score8 analyzed articles19.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst