Bronx boy, 14, shot in front of family on way to school in gang-related attack 77%

By Nicholas Williams58% Thomas Tracy42% Colin Mixson63%

5/6/2026, 2:32:11 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 28.6% saturation with 195 hits. Analysis detected 1,129 faulty-reasoning hits from 682 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 68.8% and a BS Rank of 77% (5,028 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 77.00% of the article peer group.

A 14-year-old boy was shot in the leg on his way to school by a gunman who waited in ambush at a Bronx bus stop Wednesday as the teen’s family looked on in horror, the victim’s older sister told the Daily News. 
Police sources said the teenage victim, who is affiliated with a local gang, was the intended target of the shooter. 
It was at least the second time in two weeks someone under 18 has been hit by gunfire in the city, police said. 
The Bronx victim had just left his apartment in NYCHA’s Soundview Houses on Rosedale Ave. near Seward Ave. with his father and younger sister when shots rang out about 7:30 a.m. 
“It’s just sad. 
These kids are just getting younger and younger and killing each other,” the victim’s older sister, who declined to share her name, told the Daily News. 
“They’re getting access to guns. 
It’s 7 in the morning  people are trying to get to school!” 
The victim’s older sister said her family was getting into their vehicle parked across the street from their apartment building when the gunman, wearing a black ski mask and black Nike Air Force sneakers, emerged from a nearby bus stop and opened fire on her brother. 
“He was putting my baby sister in the passengers seat,” the older sister said. 
“My brother sat in the back and my sister got in the front because her school was closer.” 
“My dad was putting my sister in the car when the guy walked up,” she added. 
“They waited until my dad turned his back. 
It was like someone was waiting and watching.” 
A neighbor witnessed the attempt on the boy’s life. 
“The car was parked and the father, daughter and little boy were going in the car and then all of a sudden it seems like a young kid ran to the car and just shot the car,” said the neighbor, who asked to remain anonymous. 
“I never witnessed nothing like this…and I’ve been here for six, seven years.” 
Medics rushed the teen to Jacobi Medical Center with a gunshot wound to the left leg. 
He is expected to recover. 
“He is okay,” his older sister said. 
“He is out of surgery and everything.” 
The shooting is believed to be linked to gang activity in the neighborhood, a police source said. 
The teen was arrested in December for carrying a loaded firearm, according to the source. 
While cops says the gunman was after the victim, his older sister wonders if it was a case of mistaken identity. 
“My brother wears the attire they wear, Nike Tech,” she said. 
The victim and his family moved into the Soundview Houses less than a year ago. 
The boy did not recognize the gunman who attacked him, his older sister said. 
“I was always worried moving down here, because of the projects,” said the older sister. 
“Why is this happening to us? 
It could happen to anybody, but everyone in this house has something going for them.” 
The gunman, who was dressed all in black, ran off. 
No arrests have been made. 
Several shots were fired, with at least one bullet hitting a nearby car window. 
Cops were scouring the area for surveillance footage in the hopes of tracking down and arresting the shooter. 
On April 27 in Queens, a 15-year-old boy was left paralyzed after he was shot in the back on a Manhattan-bound A train at it was approaching the 80th St. station in Ozone Park. 
One of the two suspects in the shooting, another 15-year-old boy, was arrested last week, charged with weapon possession for carrying the pistol the shooter used, prosecutors said. 
The actual shooter in the Queens shooting has not been caught. 
The bloodshed comes as the NYPD amps up its fight against teen gun violence. 
So far this year through April 19, 29 of the city’s 201 shooting victims have been under age 18, accounting for 14% of the victims, according to the NYPD. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.9%Nicholas Williams: 2.4%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Confirmation Bias7.9%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.4%Nicholas Williams: 3.1%newyorkdailynews: 3.4%Availability Heuristic11.4%This article: 1.6%Nicholas Williams: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic1.6%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 1.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Nicholas Williams: 5.0%newyorkdailynews: 6.1%Framing Effect6.7%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.6%Nicholas Williams: 1.5%newyorkdailynews: 2.8%Optimism Bias7.6%This article: 6.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Pessimism Bias6.0%This article: 5.4%Nicholas Williams: 8.1%newyorkdailynews: 9.8%Negativity Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 1.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 1.2%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 1.0%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 6.2%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.3%Nicholas Williams: 1.1%newyorkdailynews: 1.4%Recency Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.8%Nicholas Williams: 2.8%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Appeal to Authority13.8%This article: 3.1%Nicholas Williams: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%False Dilemma3.1%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 2.1%Nicholas Williams: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Circular Reasoning2.1%This article: 9.4%Nicholas Williams: 2.7%newyorkdailynews: 4.1%Hasty Generalization9.4%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.4%Nicholas Williams: 6.6%newyorkdailynews: 7.4%Appeal to Emotion8.4%This article: 2.5%Nicholas Williams: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Begging the Question2.5%This article: 5.0%Nicholas Williams: 2.0%newyorkdailynews: 3.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 28.6%Nicholas Williams: 3.4%newyorkdailynews: 2.6%Anecdotal28.6%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 20.7%Nicholas Williams: 1.0%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)20.7%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.9%Nicholas Williams: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Middle Ground1.9%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.2%Nicholas Williams: 2.3%newyorkdailynews: 2.1%Unattributed Quote6.2%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 1.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 10.0%Nicholas Williams: 4.1%newyorkdailynews: 6.7%Biased Writer Voice10.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 1.3%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Williams: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

682 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker6.3%attributed speech639writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageNYPD • 14 words • 0.0% coverageNYPD • 29 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

NYPD

100%flagged-word coverage
43 attributed words100% of attributed speech73% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-10.6 ptsWriter: 10.6%NYPD: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-6.6 ptsWriter: 6.6%NYPD: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.