Topic summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,834 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Game Recap results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 2,442 hits . Analysis detected 13,747 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,515 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 67% (5,511 of 16,562 topics). This Game Recap is worse (more manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group. Game Recap
Topic details
Total words: 11,515
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.7% percentile 4.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 21.2% 21.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 12.9% 12.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.1% 13.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 26.9% Recency Bias: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 2.7% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 4.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst