Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 781 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ANDREW DESTIN results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias , Hindsight Bias , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 519 hits . Analysis detected 2,604 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,343 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,018 of 6,628 authors). This ANDREW DESTIN is worse (more manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group. ANDREW DESTIN
Author details
Total words: 2,343
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.7% percentile 5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 13.4% 13.4% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 11.2% 11.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 22.1% 22.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 10.7% 10.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.7% 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 22.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Recency Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 1.4% Halo Effect: Author 10.7%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.1% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst