Topic summary
44% 8 analyzed articles/videos 3,935 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Florida Politics results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 2,884 hits . Analysis detected 17,137 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,866 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (12,847 of 16,562 topics). This Florida Politics is better (less manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group. Florida Politics
Topic details
Total words: 18,866
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score8 analyzed articles18.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.3% 15.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.2% 11.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst