Author summary
75% 1 analyzed article/video 516 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fabrizio Gowdy results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Recency Bias , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 228 hits . Analysis detected 1,119 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,548 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 75% (1,612 of 6,448 authors). This Fabrizio Gowdy is worse (more manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group. Fabrizio Gowdy
Author details
Total words: 1,548
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.0% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.7% 14.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 7.1% 7.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 5.2% 5.2% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst