Author summary
68% 2 analyzed articles/videos 647 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Janelle Irwin Taylor results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 607 hits . Analysis detected 2,832 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,353 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 27% (4,900 of 6,628 authors). This Janelle Irwin Taylor is better (less manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group. Janelle Irwin Taylor
Author details
Total words: 5,353
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 9.6% 9.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.3% 11.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst