Topic summary
14%1 analyzed article/video507 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Flint River Flotilla Fest results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 194 hits. Analysis detected 817 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,028 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 71% (6,220 of 21,113 topics). This Flint River Flotilla Fest is worse (more manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group.
Flint River Flotilla Fest
Topic details
Total words: 2,028
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510070.5% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 7.8%7.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.6%3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos