Topic summary
⁠85%2 analyzed articles/videos1,075 analyzed words
BS Summary: These First Responders results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 722 hits. Analysis detected 5,296 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,751 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,673 of 16,413 topics). This First Responders is worse (more manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
First Responders
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,751
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.3% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.7%12.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 15.2%15.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.9%11.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos