Author summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jay Scott Smith results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Framing Effect , and Loss Aversion , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 313 hits . Analysis detected 1,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,530 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 6,629 authors). This Jay Scott Smith is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Jay Scott Smith
Author details
Total words: 1,530
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 19.1% 19.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 20.5% 20.5% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 6.1% 6.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 20.5%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Author 19.1%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Loss Aversion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 2.5% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst