Michigan State Police launch statewide ‘Move Over’ enforcement: What drivers need to know 68%

By Jay Scott Smith0%

7/19/2026, 5:10:30 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Loss Aversion, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 830 faulty-reasoning hits from 510 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 61.1% and a BS Rank of 68% (7,153 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 67.30% of the article peer group.

On Monday, the Michigan State Police are cracking down on drivers who don’t move over for emergency vehicles. 
It’s a statewide effort that aims to protect first responders and remind motorists of the state’s “Move Over” laws, which have existed since 1949. 
“There are far too many lives that are lost just due to carelessness and failure to move over,” Lt. 
Ty Howard, a 10-year veteran State Trooper, said. 
“When you see those first responders on the side of the road or whatnot, you have to give them the right-of-way, you have to yield to them.” 
The coordinated enforcement effort will include law enforcement agencies from around the state, runs tomorrow from 11:00 am to 4:00 pm  and covers all Michigan highways. 
It is also one of a number of “Move Over” enforcement efforts happening on Monday, as similar efforts are happening in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Kentucky. 
“Move Over” laws exist in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. 
Howard is like so many other police officers, first responders, and construction workers who put their lives on the line every time they stop on the side of the highway. 
Michigan’s “move over” law requires drivers to safely move out of the way  or slow down to 10 miles below the speed limit  when approaching a stationary authorized vehicle with its flashing lights activated. 
This includes police vehicles, fire and EMS, tow trucks, road service vehicles, and construction vehicles. 
“Let’s use a state trooper for an example; you see one of them on the side of the road with their overhead lights activated: you need to slow down to a safe speed,” Howard said. 
“If you can’t move over, but if you have the ability to move over, you need to move over and give that person that right-of-way and yield to them.” 
“It’s not just dangerous for the state troopers,” he said. 
“It’s dangerous for all law enforcement and first responders. 
According to MSP, their patrol cars have been hit 13 times this year and seven troopers have been killed on the side of the road in the department’s history. 
The penalties for not moving over start with a civil infraction, along with a $400 fine and 2 points on your license. 
If you don’t move over and you injure or kill a first responder or construction worker, that’s a felony that can land you thousands of dollars in fines and between 2 to 15 years in prison. 
The hope is that days like Monday will keep those numbers down and keep people safe. 
“Safety is the number one thing that we’re always trying to preach to the public,” Howard said. 
“If we can come out here and make a difference and save someone’s life, it’s a mission well done for us. 
“Please make smart decisions when you’re behind the wheel of a vehicle,” Howard said. 
“If you see emergency vehicles operating out there, please yield to them. 
Just slow down. 
Move over.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 3.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Jay Scott Smith: 2.3%WDIV: 0.7%Anchoring Bias6.9%This article: 5.7%Jay Scott Smith: 3.8%WDIV: 3.0%Availability Heuristic5.7%This article: 2.5%Jay Scott Smith: 0.8%WDIV: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic2.5%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Jay Scott Smith: 1.4%WDIV: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias4.1%This article: 19.6%Jay Scott Smith: 6.5%WDIV: 4.4%Framing Effect19.6%This article: 11.4%Jay Scott Smith: 6.1%WDIV: 0.7%Loss Aversion11.4%This article: 4.7%Jay Scott Smith: 1.6%WDIV: 0.3%Status Quo Bias4.7%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.3%Jay Scott Smith: 3.5%WDIV: 2.0%Optimism Bias7.3%This article: 3.7%Jay Scott Smith: 1.2%WDIV: 0.7%Pessimism Bias3.7%This article: 5.5%Jay Scott Smith: 3.7%WDIV: 6.0%Negativity Bias5.5%This article: 3.3%Jay Scott Smith: 1.1%WDIV: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Jay Scott Smith: 3.9%WDIV: 0.7%In-Group Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Jay Scott Smith: 5.0%WDIV: 2.2%Halo Effect5.9%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%Jay Scott Smith: 0.5%WDIV: 0.1%Primacy Effect1.6%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 1.6%Jay Scott Smith: 0.5%WDIV: 3.9%Appeal to Authority1.6%This article: 5.7%Jay Scott Smith: 1.9%WDIV: 0.7%False Dilemma5.7%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 3.3%Jay Scott Smith: 1.1%WDIV: 0.3%Circular Reasoning3.3%This article: 1.8%Jay Scott Smith: 1.2%WDIV: 2.2%Hasty Generalization1.8%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.9%Jay Scott Smith: 4.1%WDIV: 0.6%Bandwagon4.9%This article: 14.1%Jay Scott Smith: 20.5%WDIV: 3.5%Appeal to Emotion14.1%This article: 4.1%Jay Scott Smith: 1.4%WDIV: 0.5%Begging the Question4.1%This article: 8.8%Jay Scott Smith: 2.9%WDIV: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.8%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 1.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 2.5%Jay Scott Smith: 0.8%WDIV: 0.2%Appeal to Nature2.5%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.9%Jay Scott Smith: 3.9%WDIV: 1.9%Anecdotal5.9%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 1.6%Jay Scott Smith: 0.5%WDIV: 1.7%Biased Writer Voice1.6%This article: 20.4%Jay Scott Smith: 19.2%WDIV: 1.9%Indoctrination20.4%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jay Scott Smith: 0.0%WDIV: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

510 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers63%attributed speech189writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Michigan State Police • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMichigan State Police • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageLt. Ty Howard • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageLt. Ty Howard • 27 words • 100.0% coverageMichigan State Police • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageMichigan • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageLt. Ty Howard • 35 words • 0.0% coverageLt. Ty Howard • 29 words • 100.0% coverageLt. Ty Howard • 10 words • 0.0% coverageLt. Ty Howard • 9 words • 0.0% coverageMichigan State Police • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageLt. Ty Howard • 17 words • 100.0% coverageLt. Ty Howard • 21 words • 0.0% coverageLt. Ty Howard • 14 words • 100.0% coverageLt. Ty Howard • 12 words • 100.0% coverageLt. Ty Howard • 3 words • 100.0% coverageLt. Ty Howard • 2 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Lt. Ty Howard

100%flagged-word coverage
198 attributed words62% of attributed speech92% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Indoctrination+52.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Lt. Ty Howard: 52.5%52.5%Biased Writer Voice-4.2 ptsWriter: 4.2%Lt. Ty Howard: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.