Topic summary
⁠53%4 analyzed articles/videos5,850 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Local Relations results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 2,073 hits. Analysis detected 19,315 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,473 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (13,442 of 16,562 topics). This Federal Local Relations is better (less manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group.
Federal Local Relations
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510018.8% percentile
1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles22.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos