Mayor Johnson's controversial plan to crack down on ICE agents now faces City Council scrutiny 20%

By Mariah Woelfel20% WBEZ14%

7/15/2026, 10:30:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 32 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Confirmation Bias, and Begging the Question, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.4% saturation with 407 hits. Analysis detected 2,204 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,383 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 34.2% and a BS Rank of 20% (17,113 of 21,176 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 80.80% of the article peer group.

Mayor Brandon Johnson was flanked by political allies and organizers who cheered as he inked an executive order earlier this year directing Chicago police to investigate federal immigration agents and potentially seek charges. 
The “ICE on Notice” order felt, for many, like a vital punch back after the city endured Operation Midway Blitz, the Trump administration’s brutal deportation campaign last fall. 
Residents and even cops were tear-gassed . 
Agents caused car crashes to carry out arrests. 
A woman was shot five times on the city’s Southwest Side. 
And an immigrant father was shot to death in suburban Franklin Park. 
“We need to send a clear message: If the federal government will not hold these rogue actors accountable, then Chicago will do everything in our power to bring these agents to justice,” Johnson said in January. 
Protester Paul Ivery is arrested by U.S. 
Border Patrol agents outside of an immigration processing facility in September. 
Candace Dane Chambers/Sun-Times 
Police were directed to form new procedures within 30 days to implement the mayor’s order. 
But nearly five months after that deadline, it’s unclear what the decree has accomplished or what more needs to be done to enforce it. 
Those questions will be the topic of a City Council hearing this week as enforcement intensifies in the Chicago area , with advocates reporting at least 17 arrests last week by U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement. 
“We are seeing many more ICE incidents  we're seeing a surge,” said Pooja Ravindran, the chief of staff of the Committee on Immigrant and Refugee Rights, which is holding the hearing. 
“It's July, we want to know what the holdup is.” 
Johnson’s order mostly clarifies that standard police work  like taking complaints, using body cameras and rendering medical aid  shouldn’t stop, even if federal agents are considered crime suspects. 
But it also has some controversial new tenets. 
It requires the police department to try to identify the name and badge number of top federal agents on scene. 
And it requires officers to refer felony matters to Cook County State’s Attorney Eileen O’Neill Burke “at the direction of the Mayor’s Office.” 
O’Neill Burke has slammed that piece as “wholly inappropriate.” 
Eileen O’Neill Burke speaks after being sworn in as the Cook County state’s attorney in December 2024. 
Ashlee Rezin/Sun-Times 
Ahead of the hearing, Ravindran shared a list of nearly four dozen questions for the mayor’s office and police department, including: 
Which sections of the executive order are new directives, and which are just re-statements of protocol that exist? 
What happens if a police officer doesn’t follow these orders? 
Can you share the exact training curriculum and materials that pertain to this order? 
Is there a test at the end to assess understanding? 
But the public might not get those answers at Friday’s hearing, at least from police leaders. 
That’s because the department has declined the invitation, Ravindran said. 
The department referred all of WBEZ’s questions to Johnson’s office, which does plan to attend. 
A mayoral spokesperson defended the impact of the executive order, saying it “reaffirmed the City’s commitment to ensure that reports alleging federal officials have violated state or local law are accepted, processed, and tracked appropriately”  indicating there may previously have been a problem with cops processing complaints against federal agents. 
“CPD has clarified to its members that they must accept reports” against federal officials and “process those reports,” the spokesperson said in a statement. 
A federal immigration agent speaks with Chicago police leaders in October in East Side, where protesters gathered after a federal vehicle crashed during a pursuit. 
Anthony Vazquez/Sun-Times 
But the mayor’s office also appeared to walk back previous assertions. 
For instance, Johnson told reporters in March that, after further review, he didn’t believe that a new police policy was necessary to implement the order, despite the 30-day stipulation. 
“It turns out that the policy that [police] have in place is applicable to what we’re asking them to do,” Johnson said at the time. 
The spokesperson acknowledged that formal guidance is still under development. 
That includes issuing guidance for tracking allegations against federal agents and publishing data on complaints, as required by the order. 
Johnson’s office hasn’t reviewed or consulted on any potential referrals for criminal charges to the state’s attorney since the order was signed, the spokesperson said. 
“The Mayor’s Office’s role is to establish that policy direction, not to review, oversee, or participate in individual investigations or referral decisions,” the spokesperson said. 
Ald. 
Andre Vasquez (40th), who chairs the committee holding Friday’s hearing, said the goal is to understand what more needs to happen to give these policies teeth. 
“We need to find out what that protocol should be so that it's actually functioning as intended. 
Because if it isn't, then it is at best misguided and at worst lip service,” Vasquez said. 
Advocates who want to see the executive order enforced point to a recent, high-profile incident in Albany Park , where an ICE agent crashed an SUV into a woman’s car and fled before police arrived. 
A federal agent points a Taser at bystanders while detaining a man in Albany Park on June 2. 
Violet Miller/Sun-Times 
Ravindran said this is the type of case that could be investigated and potentially referred for criminal prosecution. 
Instead, officers simply “clocked it as a traffic incident” because that’s how witnesses characterized it, Ravindran said. 
“To kind of put the burden on residents knowing what buzzwords they need to say in order for the officer who is doing the intake is a little difficult ... 
Your average resident of Chicago is not an expert in a CPD process,” Ravindran said. 
Omar Flores, with the Chicago Alliance Against Racist and Political Repression, blames the police department, not the mayor’s office, for “dragging their feet on this overall policy.” 
He wants to see a formal outline of the department’s process for identifying a federal agent on scene, for instance. 
“A few individuals of their force may be a little upset that they got tear-gassed,” Flores said, referring to an incident during Operation Midway Blitz in which police officers were caught in the middle of a chaotic scene. 
But “it’s nothing compared to what they risk supporting” the executive order, Flores argued. 
“They're also people that don't want to be held accountable ... 
They're not missing the forest for the trees. 
They see this as a risk to themselves as well,” he said. 
Flores said his group hasn't seen formal policy related to the executive order, but he believes it has moved the needle by forcing the state’s attorney’s office to respond to concerns about ICE prosecutions. 
Part of the impetus for the meeting was a June hearing where a top official in the prosecutor’s office testified on an unrelated subject. 
Ald. 
Jessie Fuentes (26th) took the chance to grill Yvette Loizon, chief assistant state’s attorney of policy and external affairs, about the office’s handling of federal agents. 
“Your office has refused to bring charges to ICE agents who have shot, killed and assaulted individuals in Cook County,” Fuentes said. 
Ald. 
Jessie Fuentes (26th) speaks to Ald. 
Mike Rodriguez (22nd) during a City Council meeting in December. 
Pat Nabong/Sun-Times 
Loizon strongly disputed that assertion. 
“The state of Illinois has significant, significant restrictions put on our ability to investigate crime,” Loizon said. 
“That is the responsibility of law enforcement. 
Once law enforcement has investigated a crime, they can come to our office and seek investigative support, and they can all also ask us to review a case for charging.” 
Jordan Esparza-Kelley, an advocate with the Council on American-Islamic Relations who was present at the ceremonial signing of the executive order, said the finger-pointing between the police department and state’s attorney’s office is eroding trust with “everyday average people.” 
“You tell us we have laws, then ICE doesn't follow the laws. 
Neither does CPD,” he said. 
“Are we the only people under the law? 
Are these lawless agencies? 
What is going on?” 
Mayor Brandon Johnson orders CPD to investigate federal immigration agents for potential prosecution 
County’s top prosecutor calls Mayor Brandon Johnson’s ICE executive order ‘wholly inappropriate’ 
Mayor Johnson says he’s not trying to control which ICE abuse cases get referred to state’s attorney 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.9%Mariah Woelfel: 4.8%Chicago Sun-Times: 3.1%Confirmation Bias11.9%This article: 0.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Mariah Woelfel: 4.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.8%Availability Heuristic6.9%This article: 0.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Mariah Woelfel: 3.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 5.6%Framing Effect5.2%This article: 0.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.9%Mariah Woelfel: 0.7%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.8%Status Quo Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.3%Mariah Woelfel: 1.7%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.7%Optimism Bias4.3%This article: 4.1%Mariah Woelfel: 1.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.4%Pessimism Bias4.1%This article: 29.4%Mariah Woelfel: 11.7%Chicago Sun-Times: 8.4%Negativity Bias29.4%This article: 2.5%Mariah Woelfel: 1.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias2.5%This article: 4.8%Mariah Woelfel: 1.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error4.8%This article: 2.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias2.0%This article: 1.1%Mariah Woelfel: 0.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.7%In-Group Bias1.1%This article: 0.8%Mariah Woelfel: 0.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.8%This article: 0.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.3%Mariah Woelfel: 0.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.7%Recency Bias2.3%This article: 1.8%Mariah Woelfel: 0.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.5%Primacy Effect1.8%This article: 0.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.8%Mariah Woelfel: 0.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.8%This article: 0.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.9%Mariah Woelfel: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.9%Appeal to Authority0.9%This article: 4.3%Mariah Woelfel: 1.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.6%False Dilemma4.3%This article: 0.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 2.2%Mariah Woelfel: 0.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Circular Reasoning2.2%This article: 6.7%Mariah Woelfel: 4.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 4.8%Hasty Generalization6.7%This article: 4.0%Mariah Woelfel: 1.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Red Herring4.0%This article: 0.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.0%Mariah Woelfel: 3.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion7.0%This article: 9.4%Mariah Woelfel: 2.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.0%Begging the Question9.4%This article: 2.5%Mariah Woelfel: 0.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.5%This article: 1.2%Mariah Woelfel: 0.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Tu Quoque1.2%This article: 1.6%Mariah Woelfel: 0.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.3%Burden of Proof1.6%This article: 0.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 14.4%Mariah Woelfel: 4.9%Chicago Sun-Times: 3.2%Anecdotal14.4%This article: 0.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.4%Mariah Woelfel: 1.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.4%This article: 0.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 3.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.8%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Special Pleading3.0%This article: 0.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.3%Mariah Woelfel: 0.8%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.9%Unattributed Quote3.3%This article: 3.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.9%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection3.0%This article: 6.6%Mariah Woelfel: 3.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 4.6%Biased Writer Voice6.6%This article: 2.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.2%Indoctrination2.0%This article: 0.0%Mariah Woelfel: 1.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mariah Woelfel: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1383 words analyzed.

Speakers

8speakers50%attributed speech691writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMayor Brandon Johnson • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coveragePooja Ravindran • 32 words • 100.0% coveragePooja Ravindran • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageEileen O’Neill Burke • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coveragePooja Ravindran • 18 words • 0.0% coveragePooja Ravindran • 10 words • 0.0% coveragePooja Ravindran • 14 words • 0.0% coveragePooja Ravindran • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coveragePooja Ravindran • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 51 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageMayor Brandon Johnson • 29 words • 0.0% coverageMayor Brandon Johnson • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageAndre Vasquez • 26 words • 0.0% coverageAndre Vasquez • 17 words • 0.0% coverageAndre Vasquez • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coveragePooja Ravindran • 18 words • 0.0% coveragePooja Ravindran • 17 words • 0.0% coveragePooja Ravindran • 30 words • 0.0% coveragePooja Ravindran • 15 words • 0.0% coverageOmar Flores • 27 words • 0.0% coverageOmar Flores • 20 words • 0.0% coverageOmar Flores • 38 words • 0.0% coverageOmar Flores • 14 words • 0.0% coverageOmar Flores • 11 words • 0.0% coverageOmar Flores • 8 words • 0.0% coverageOmar Flores • 12 words • 0.0% coverageOmar Flores • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageJessie Fuentes • 26 words • 0.0% coverageJessie Fuentes • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageJessie Fuentes • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageYvette Loizon • 5 words • 0.0% coverageYvette Loizon • 17 words • 0.0% coverageYvette Loizon • 7 words • 0.0% coverageYvette Loizon • 30 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Esparza-Kelley • 39 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Esparza-Kelley • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Esparza-Kelley • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Esparza-Kelley • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Esparza-Kelley • 4 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Esparza-Kelley • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mayor Brandon Johnson

100%flagged-word coverage
90 attributed words13% of attributed speech68% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice+36.7 ptsWriter: 3.3%Mayor Brandon Johnson: 40.0%40.0%Unattributed Quote-6.7 ptsWriter: 6.7%Mayor Brandon Johnson: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-4.8 ptsWriter: 4.8%Mayor Brandon Johnson: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-4.1 ptsWriter: 4.1%Mayor Brandon Johnson: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.