Author summary
20% 1 analyzed article/video 1,383 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mariah Woelfel results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 649 hits . Analysis detected 3,397 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,532 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 25% (4,674 of 6,228 authors). This Mariah Woelfel is better (less manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group. Mariah Woelfel
Author details
Total words: 5,532
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.7% 11.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.8% 4.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst