Topic summary
⁠72%2 analyzed articles/videos1,134 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Charges results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 874 hits. Analysis detected 3,996 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,155 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (9,347 of 16,562 topics). This Federal Charges is better (less manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
Federal Charges
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,155
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510043.6% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.7%11.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.9%13.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos