Topic summary
77% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,649 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fashion Industry results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 3,340 hits . Analysis detected 27,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,136 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 54% (7,764 of 16,562 topics). This Fashion Industry is worse (more manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group. Fashion Industry
Topic details
Total words: 17,136
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.1% percentile 3.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles17.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 17.9% 17.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 13.0% 13.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst