Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video841 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Morwenna Ferrier results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 543 hits. Analysis detected 3,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,855 of 6,299 authors). This Morwenna Ferrier is worse (more manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group.
Morwenna Ferrier
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
71%Morwenna Ferrier (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,364
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

71% percentile
025507510070.6% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.2%6.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 16.1%16.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 6.0%6.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 2.0%2.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 7.5%7.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 16.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Horn Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos