Topic summary
⁠47%2 analyzed articles/videos1,099 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Farmworker Movement results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 592 hits. Analysis detected 5,121 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,579 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (14,380 of 16,562 topics). This Farmworker Movement is better (less manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group.
Farmworker Movement
Topic details
Total words: 7,579
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510013.2% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.0%6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos