Topic summary
17% 9 analyzed articles/videos 6,890 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Family Dynamics results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 3,425 hits . Analysis detected 27,476 faulty-reasoning hits from 43,476 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 3% (15,013 of 15,448 topics). This Family Dynamics is better (less manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group. Family Dynamics
Topic details
Total words: 43,476
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.8% percentile 1.3% BS Score9 analyzed articles43.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst