Topic summary
⁠18%3 analyzed articles/videos3,197 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Exoplanets results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 1,166 hits. Analysis detected 8,258 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,702 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (13,748 of 15,759 topics). This Exoplanets is better (less manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group.
Exoplanets
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,702
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510012.8% percentile
1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.0%10.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos