Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,546 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gayoung Lee results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 1,055 hits . Analysis detected 9,002 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,184 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 12% (5,627 of 6,359 authors). This Gayoung Lee is better (less manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group. Gayoung Lee
Author details
Total words: 14,184
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst