Topic summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,737 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Swalwell results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Ad Hominem , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 1,168 hits . Analysis detected 8,866 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,948 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 46% (8,977 of 16,562 topics). This Eric Swalwell is better (less manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group. Eric Swalwell
Topic details
Total words: 6,948
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.8% percentile 2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst