Topic summary
⁠14%1 analyzed article/video507 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Recovery results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 194 hits. Analysis detected 817 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,028 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (6,231 of 21,334 topics). This Environmental Recovery is worse (more manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group.
Environmental Recovery
Topic details
Total words: 2,028
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510070.8% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 7.8%7.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.6%3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos