Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,933 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Market results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 1,038 hits. Analysis detected 7,406 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,844 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,268 of 16,562 topics). This Energy Market is worse (more manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group.
Energy Market
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,844
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.1% percentile
3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.2%15.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.9%6.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.9%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos