Topic summary
⁠97%2 analyzed articles/videos824 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Affordability results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 44.6% saturation with 1,196 hits. Analysis detected 6,932 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,679 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (2,975 of 16,562 topics). This Energy Affordability is worse (more manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group.
Energy Affordability
Topic details
Total words: 2,679
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510082.0% percentile
6.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 44.6%44.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.4%19.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 14.7%14.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 10.5%10.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.9%24.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 20.1%20.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 44.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos