Topic summary
84% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,440 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Endangered Species Act results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 2,151 hits . Analysis detected 19,425 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,554 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 47% (8,382 of 15,769 topics). This Endangered Species Act is better (less manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group. Endangered Species Act
Topic details
Total words: 14,554
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.8% percentile 2.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles14.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst