Topic summary
⁠87%4 analyzed articles/videos1,012 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emulation results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 937 hits. Analysis detected 8,105 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,620 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (7,871 of 16,212 topics). This Emulation is worse (more manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group.
Emulation
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,620
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.5% percentile
3.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.2%14.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.2%12.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos