Topic summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video853 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emotional Well Being results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 212 hits. Analysis detected 1,876 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,559 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,320 of 16,562 topics). This Emotional Well Being is better (less manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Emotional Well Being
Topic details
Total words: 2,559
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510037.7% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Middle Ground: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos