Author summary
54% 1 analyzed article/video 853 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diana Raab Ph.D. results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 212 hits . Analysis detected 1,876 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,559 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 46% (3,473 of 6,348 authors). This Diana Raab Ph.D. is better (less manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group. Diana Raab Ph.D.
Author details
Total words: 2,559
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.3% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.2% 3.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 6.5%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Middle Ground: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst