Topic summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video777 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Electoral Integrity results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Indoctrination, and Slippery Slope, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 334 hits. Analysis detected 2,368 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,331 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,303 of 16,245 topics). This Electoral Integrity is worse (more manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group.
Electoral Integrity
Topic details
Total words: 2,331
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510067.4% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 8.5%8.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.3%14.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.6%13.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos