Topic summary
⁠5%2 analyzed articles/videos336 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Integration results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 405 hits. Analysis detected 3,312 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,188 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (16,226 of 16,562 topics). This Economic Integration is better (less manipulative) than 98.00% of the peer group.
Economic Integration
Topic details
Total words: 9,188
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

2% percentile
02550751002.0% percentile
1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos