Topic summary
⁠28%2 analyzed articles/videos739 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Disparities results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 3.7% saturation with 212 hits. Analysis detected 1,795 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,776 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (19,029 of 21,121 topics). This Economic Disparities is better (less manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group.
Economic Disparities
Topic details
Total words: 5,776
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

10% percentile
02550751009.9% percentile
1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos