Author summary
17% 1 analyzed article/video 739 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olivera Perkins results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Anecdotal , and Anchoring Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 193 hits . Analysis detected 1,236 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,956 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 34% (5,555 of 8,404 authors). This Olivera Perkins is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group. Olivera Perkins
Author details
Total words: 2,956
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst