Publication summary
16% 9 analyzed articles/videos 6,817 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oklahoma Watch results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 1,540 hits . Analysis detected 12,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,046 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 7% (504 of 542 publications). This Oklahoma Watch is better (less manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 32,046
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.0% percentile 0.8% BS Score9 analyzed articles32K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst