Author summary
45% 2 analyzed articles/videos 415 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Yim results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anchoring Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 249 hits . Analysis detected 1,162 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,660 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 75% (2,091 of 8,283 authors). This Matthew Yim is worse (more manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group. Matthew Yim
Author details
Total words: 1,660
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.8% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.0% 15.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 3.9% 3.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 6.5% 6.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst