Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Keaton Ross results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 2.6% saturation with 51 hits . Analysis detected 315 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,958 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 8,290 authors). This Keaton Ross is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Keaton Ross
Author details
Total words: 1,958
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst