Topic summary
73% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,206 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drug Development results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 741 hits . Analysis detected 7,628 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,284 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 53% (7,824 of 16,562 topics). This Drug Development is worse (more manipulative) than 52.80% of the peer group. Drug Development
Topic details
Total words: 6,284
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.8% percentile 3.1% BS Score7 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 11.8% 11.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.0% 5.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst